Category: British Royal Family

The Markle Sparkle

The New Duke & Duchess of Sussex


The Markle Sparkle

There is only one verdict during the royal wedding yesterday between Prince Harry and Hollywood actress, Meghan Markle, it was a success – a history making.

After  weeks of salacious revelations about the Markles and Meghan, yesterday put a lid to all the controversies.  The lid might be temporary, we shall see.

Remember how Sarah Fergusson was at first the darling of the crowd in 1986?  Did not last long 🙁

Yesterday, the world had seen how Meghan was so poised and dignified.  Meghan sparkled.

Her dress was expensively simple, which suited her well.  The pièce de résistance to her wedding ensemble was the purity and simplicity of the Queen Mary Diamond Bandeau Tiara.  A real show stopper!  It was perfectly nestled into a long train of veil, which cascaded behind her like a silken river.  The veil was embroidered by all the flowers from the 53 commonwealth nations.

She might yet be the real thing, a real duchess.

Well she is officially the Duchess of Sussex, (Countess ) Lady of Dumbarton and (Baroness) Lady of Kilkeel and also being Princess Harry. ‘A list’ guests attending with members of public. Millions around the world watched or listened to a bright, joyous and happy event, sadly rare at present in the world at large. We saw part of the RAF wedding fly by of planes over our garden en route to Windsor on a glorious sunny day.

Congratulations and Best Wishes.

Markle – Windsor Conspiracy

Harry & Meghan

Markle – Windsor Conspiracy

Omigod!  This wedding is turning into a farce.

It doesn’t bode well for their future.  But then again having said that, Meghan and her own family might just fit in nice and well with the British Royal Family.

I am so looking forward to the next instalment of their drama.

 

It is like Coronation Street, Eastenders, Emmerdale, The Beverley Hillbillies, The Munsters & Dowtown Abbey rolled into one and topped by a hint of Deliverance.

Netflix should jumped immediately into making a drama based on the Markle Windsor alliance.

I have to admit that when Harry and Meghan first announced their engagement, I was not in anyway bothered except for wishing them well.

But as the days start to near the actual nuptial, I am becoming overwhelmed with excitement and gawky mirth.

It is not the excitement of wanting to know what Meghan would wear.

But…

The more on the unfolding drama behind Meghan Markle’s family background, which is riveting; better than stylised fiction. 🙂

I am pretty sure many in the palace admin/PR side are loosing their hair from grabbing them in frustration.

As they solve one incident, another pops up right behind immediately.

The ‘will he, won’t he?’ saga about Thomas Markle walking his daughter down the aisle is frankly hilarious!

And now I am pretty sure not the only one that think the Royal Family will be blamed for Meghan’s father not attending the wedding after all.  This will be a conspiracy.

The Royal Family will be blamed for looking down on Meghan’s family.

This should not be the case as the Royal Family is as dysfunctional as Meghan’s own.

Who could forget about the Sophiegate better known as Sophie Tape of 2001, where Sophie, the Countess of Wesses (wife of Edward- QEII youngest son) was rather forthright in her criticism of a lot of people.  And it was also said that Edward and Sophie are like a marionettes for the right price, allegedly.

Who can forget the many scandals attached to Prince Andrew.  I do feel sorry for him because he was thwarted when he was romancing Koo Stark.  In the end he had to make do with Fergie and her toe sucking antics.

What about Tampax Charlie and his darling Camilla.  He had to marry his mistress, who he can’t marry the first time round because his mummy did not approve.

Though I love Diana, of course, we all know almost everything about her and her murky past.

Yap Meghan will fit in nicely with the royals.

A word of advice to the Royal Family.  Get a private jet and bring Meghan’s father to the wedding, otherwise there will always be a hint that the cog in the royal machine had something to do with the none appearance of the father of the bride.

It’s smoking conspiracy!  🙂

For all it is worth,

WE WOULD LIKE TO WISH MEGHAN AND HARRY A HAPPY LIFE TOGETHER!


 

The poor Duke of Edinburgh is probably sedated at the moment with all the goings on with the Markles. LOL A latest gossip was that Father Markle had the heart attack because he was so upset with his son for having written to Prince Harry imploring him to run away from his sister. LOL

 

 

Diana – Princess of Wales

Sometimes, when one person is missing, the whole world seems depopulated.
– Lamartine

Diana – Princess of Wales

Today is the 20th year anniversary of the death of the Princess.   She was only 37 years old when she died.

I still remember what I was doing when I found out that she had died.

It was the weekend and we got up rather late. It was almost midday.  I went to boil the kettle in preparation to make breakfast/brunch/lunch.  I turned on the radio and just caught the tail end of the news, where the newscaster was rather excited and almost shouting about the princess death.

I run immediately to the the living room (extension part of the house) where Peter and James were reading.

I told them starkly that Diana was dead.  For a moment we were all in shock.  Peter said I was joking.  She was in the paper just yesterday, swimming.

Peter turned on the tv and there Diana was being confirmed as dead from car crash together with her lover in Paris.

May she rest in peace.

The Queen @ 88 by David Bailey

“I’ve always been a huge fan of the Queen, she has very kind eyes with a mischievous glint.”
– David Bailey
4-Elizabeth-II-AFP-Getty

This photo was taken by David Bailey, a renowned English/British photographer, at Buckingham Palace in March 2014 in honour of the Queen’s 88 birthday. This is also a part of the Government’s initiative to increase tourism.

I thought her hair was cropped too short in this photo or portrait but the more I look at it, the more I like it and quite admire it.

Well done David Bailey.

And wishing the Queen a Happy Birthday and long may she reigns!

The Cost of Christmas

This is such an interesting article from the BBC Magazine.  It tells how Christmas became so commercialised.

It started during the reign of Queen Victoria when German Prince Albert, the Queen’s consort, brought Christmas celebration, Christmas tree and decoration to the British Monarchy.

…………………………

The costs of Christmas past and Christmas present

By Sarah Treanor

Business reporter, BBC News

The Royal Christmas Tree is admired by Victoria, Albert and their children in 1848
The Royal Christmas Tree admired by Victoria, Albert and their children in 1848

Christmas as we know it in 2013, with its tear-jerking adverts on television, online shopping bonanza, and parade of “must-have” toys and gifts, may seem a very commercial and modern business.

However, many Christmas traditions that dominate the modern British home are not new at all.

From the bauble-bedecked tree, to the crackers, the presents and roast dinner, the “commercialisation” of Christmas has its roots firmly in mid-Victorian Britain.

But while for many Victorians, nuts and dried fruit would have been the typical presents hanging from the tree, this year UK households will spend around £22.3bn on Christmas and families will splash out a very large-sounding £599 each on gifts alone, according to a YouGov survey.

“Start Quote

Poverty and oysters always seem to go together”

Sam WellerCharacter from Dickens’s The Pickwick Papers

YouGov also found that the average planned spend on food and drink will be £180, and on cards, trees and decorations £43.

So what do we owe to the Victorians as we gear up for the big day, and how much did a Victorian household expect to spend on their festivities?

Show off with beef

Of course the cost of various things in Victorian Britain bears no relation to the modern day. Rent and fuel was very cheap by modern standards, and there was a vast difference in wages between labourers and the emerging middle and upper-middle classes.

But what is the same is that for the Victorian, Christmas food itself was a luxury item, much as it is now.

Food historian Dr Annie Gray says that the meat was very much the main event, and the type of meat on a Victorian table depended often on where in the country a family lived.

A Victorian card
This Victorian card shows a wealthy family digging into their Christmas roast

“The meat to show off with was beef,” she says.

‘Poor man’s protein’

For a less wealthy family, perhaps that of a junior clerk, earning as little as £100 a year in the mid-Victorian era, beef and turkey were far beyond even a special occasion budget.

More likely, if in London and the South of England, the family would start the meal with oysters. While considered a luxury for many now, oysters in Victorian London were known as “the poor man’s protein”.

Charles Dickens’s character from The Pickwick Papers, Sam Weller, even says, “Poverty and oysters always seem to go together.”

An illustration from Dickens's A Christmas Carol
An illustration from Dickens’s A Christmas Carol

The goose was also the meat centrepiece for a less well-off family where beef or turkey were beyond reach.

As the traditional British rhyme says:

“Christmas is coming, the geese are getting fat

“Please put a penny in the old man’s hat

“If you haven’t got a penny, a ha’penny will do

“If you haven’t got a ha’penny then God bless you!”

A week’s wages

The cost of a Victorian Christmas

  • Goose: 7 shillings
  • Pudding: 5 shillings
  • Sage, onions, oranges: 3 shillings
  • Christmas card: 1 shilling

Food, and indeed giving were in vogue from the 1840s.

Plum pudding, and mince pies were also fashionable at the Victorian Christmas table. Sweet chestnuts, Dr Gray adds, were used as “ice cream, set cream, in stuffing, or as an accompaniment” for the meal.

“A classic mid-Victorian meal was three to five courses, with four to eight dishes in each, set on the table all at once with diners choosing their favourite dishes.

“By the end, a more linear service style had come in, but the dish variety and order remained roughly the same,” she says.

How much might this have cost?

A copy of the first mass-produced Christmas card from 1843
A copy of the first mass-produced Christmas card from 1843

According to the 1844 play A Christmas Carol/The Miser’s Warning (a theatre adaptation by CZ Barnett of the Dickens novel) the character Bob Cratchit would have spent a week’s wages to buy the ingredients for the basic Christmas feast.

That would be seven shillings for the goose, five for the pudding, and three for the onions, sage and oranges.

So that’s the food. But what about the rest?

The first Christmas card – ‘a flop’

In 1843 the first commercially produced Christmas card was launched. It cost a shilling – an extremely high price at the time. (Incidentally, 1843 was also the year that Dickens published A Christmas Carol.)

Tim Travis, a curator at the Victoria and Albert Museum, where the original card produced by Sir Henry Cole is kept, says the one shilling Christmas card would have been “roughly a day’s wage for a labourer”. It was, he says a “commercial flop”.

“Christmas cards didn’t really take off for another 20 years or so after that when mass production brought the price down,” says Mr Travis.

A Victorian Christmas card
Christmas cards such as this one from the 1860s showed family scenes

But the practice of sending Christmas cards became affordable and fashionable for many and by 1880 over 11 million Christmas cards were printed. The introduction of penny postage meant that sending a card became the “done thing”, and cards often showed jolly images of families indulging in Christmas culinary delights.

Now the UK Christmas card market is still robust, and though it has fallen away in the past few years due to email, the Greetings Cards Association estimates that a total of around 900 million festive cards were sold in 2012, worth around £364m.

‘Delight in the tree’

Many of our modern traditions and expenses were brought over from Germany by Queen Victoria’s husband, Prince Albert.

A woman dragging a fir tree over a field
A fir tree became a must-have in a Victorian household

In 1848 a print showing the royal couple with their children next to a fir tree was published in the Illustrated London News. The Prince had written in 1847 that his children should “delight in the Christmas tree”.

The tree became the must-have item in any fashionable festive home, and still is. Around six million live fir trees are sold for Christmas in Britain, according to the Forestry Commission.

A bang!

Crackers were invented by Tom Smith in 1847.

The London sweetmaker originally planned to wrap sweets in coloured paper, inspired by trips to Paris where he saw such treats. But another version, with mottos, hats and toys proved much more popular, and the cracker as we know it was born.

Today, British cracker making company Swantex produces 25 million a year. Some estimate that each household in the UK will spend upwards of £20 on crackers at Christmas.

A lot to thank the Victorians for, and perhaps, when looking at New Year bank balances, to lament.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-25305032

The Forgotten Prince – Who?

I am sure Charles is a good person, unfortunately he fell for the wrong person.  That wrong person was not Diana, the late Princess of Wales, but I am talking about Camilla.

If he only put everything he’s got to loving Diana, all would have been well.  Afterall, she gave him two handsome boys.

Instead, Charles behaved appallingly, like a spoilt brat.  He wanted to have his cake and eat it too; his caddish behaviour ultimately almost brought down the monarchy.

The virginal Diana who gorged on Barbara Cartland novels wanted her very own prince who would love her and only her.  But found out from the outset that her prince was still into his married mistress, Camilla, in a big way.  Camilla was always there like a bad smell.

So Charles is just getting his karma now.  He got his beloved mistress/wife but lose his subjects’ affection and “reverence”.  Charles is not forgotten but rather ignored by his own making.  He did not make it easy for the public to like him.

He once said apparently that when he sits on the throne, he , King Tampax, would like to be known as the Defenders of ALL faiths!   He would rewrite the history of the Anglican Church presumably!

I would say that it would be better if he abdicates and leaves the succession to William.  Hope the Queen goes on for a long, long, long time.

God Save The Queen!

 The Forgotten Prince – Who?

Charles Fears Becoming A ‘Prisoner’ As King

Sky News – 1 hour 30 minutes ago

Charles Fears Becoming A 'Prisoner' As KingCharles Fears Becoming A ‘Prisoner’ As King

The Prince of Wales is not in a rush to become king because he views the role of monarch as a form of “prison”, according to an aide.

In an interview with Time magazine, the member of Prince Charles’ household claimed the 64-year-old heir to the throne is concerned he will not achieve enough with his various interests before “the prison shades” close.

The US weekly magazine’s editor-at-large, Catherine Mayer, was given unrivalled access to more than 50 of Charles’s close friends and staff for a profile ahead of his 65th birthday, which falls next month.

She was also granted an exclusive interview with Charles himself.

Ms Mayer says Charles is aware that as soon as he does ascend the throne he will have to drop his numerous charities and projects that he has spent his life nurturing and instead take on “joyless” duties.

She concludes: “Far from itching to assume the crown, he is already feeling its weight and worrying about the impact on the job he has been doing.”

Ms Mayer writes that the Royal has long suffered misperceptions that he is “aloof, spoiled and desperate to become king”.

She describes him instead as a “passionate philanthropist, magnetic in his personal interactions and deeply committed to making the most of his inherited position”.

Meanwhile, Charles tells the magazine he has had a lifelong desire to “heal and make things better.”

“I’ve had this extraordinary feeling, for years and years, ever since I can remember really, of wanting to heal and make things better,” Charles is quoted as saying.

“I feel more than anything else it’s my duty to worry about everybody and their lives in this country, to try to find a way of improving things if I possibly can.”

He also reveals that he recently staged a rehearsal to help teach his son, Prince William, how to host an investiture ceremony in which Britons receive knighthoods and other honours.

The Duke of Cambridge presided over his first investiture at Buckingham Palace last week without any problems.

In the feature, Ms Mayer quotes the actress Emma Thompson as saying dancing with her “old friend” Charles is “better than sex”.

Ms Mayer also revealed that the high profile guests that grace Charles’ dinner table are known as “Bond villains” by members of his household.

The British Monarchs (Line of Succession)

queen in line

In line to the Throne

In line to the Throne

The British Monarchs (Line of Succession)

I love this photo.  The Queen and her heirs to the throne: first (Charles),second (William) and third (George) .  The photo was taken during Prince George’s christening.

4 current generation of the British Monarchy.  Brilliant.  I hope though that the Queens lives on for years and years to come ……..

THE LINE OF SUCCESSION (In order)
The Prince of Wales
Prince William of Wales
Prince George of Cambridge
Princess Charlotte of Cambridge
Prince Henry of Wales
The Duke of York
Princess Beatrice of York
Princess Eugenie of York
The Earl of Wessex
Viscount Severn
The Lady Louise Windsor
The Princess Royal
Mr Peter Phillips
Miss Zara Phillips

%d bloggers like this: