Tag: Philippines Pork Barrel

Pork Barrel (PDAF) is going, Going GONE!!!

Yippeee

Pork Barrel (PDAF) is going, Going GONE!!!

The power of the people prevailed. The power of the internet worked brilliantly. We, here, at GlobalGranary.Org are pleased to have been part of the internet ‘soldiers’, who made sure that the pork barrel scandal did not end up being swept under the carpet like most anomalies and corruptions that happen in the Philippines. OUR reblog on Jean Napoles was a total hit!we had 35000 views within hours of publishing the blog, It even caused our site to wobble with overload!!

We promised that we, here, at GlobalGranary will not stop at this pork barrel scandal. We are going to be a set of eyes and ears for the Filipinos from now on. WE HAVE PNOY’s YOUTUBE ANNOUNCEMENT ABOUT TRANSPARENCY FROM NOW ON AND WE ARE GOING TO HOLD HIM TO THAT!!!

Let’s hope that his words will translate into action.

WELL DONE FILIPINOS! Let us make this a start for a better government!

One thing, we at GlobalGranary.org would like to remind Filipinos that it was Mr Bertini “Toto” Causing who preempted the interest of Filipinos at home and abroad regarding the pork barrel. His brilliant blog on Jeane Lim Napoles was the steering wheel that made bloggers and readers alike to join and add their thoughts and feelings that cannot be ignored anymore thus precipitated the PNoy to abolish the inherently flawed PDAF/Pork Barrel funding system.

WELL DONE FILIPINOS WE ARE SO CHUFFED. AS WE SAY IN THE UK, THE VOICE OF EVERYMAN WAS HEARD!!!

HISTORY HAS BEEN MADE

Jean & Peter

————————————————————————–

Pork barrel out; no more NGOs

Aquino admits his reforms failed to stop corruption of pork funds

By TJ Burgonio and Christian V. Esguerra

12:09 am | Saturday, August 24th, 2013

It’s time to abolish the PDAF,” President Benigno Aquino III announced during a surprise press conference on Friday.

“Let’s forget NGO. There will be no more NGOs,” Speaker Feliciano Belmonte Jr. said Friday, declaring an end to dealings between congressmen and nongovernment organizations in the financing of projects.

Answering questions from reporters after his announcement, Mr. Aquino said he was not threatened by next Monday’s rally against the Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) or pork barrel.

“Why should we be worried? We’ve gained more allies in fixing the system. Thanks a lot to them,” Mr. Aquino said.

The President said he was scandalized by the Commission on Audit’s findings and he blamed it all on the administration of former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, now a representative of Pampanga in the House.

With the abolition of the PDAF, Mr. Aquino said the executive and the two Houses of Congress would find a new way to deal with the needs of constituents “in a manner that is transparent, methodical and rational” and “not susceptible” to abuse.

From now on, the President said, lawmakers could identify and “suggest” projects in the congressional districts but these had to “go through the budgetary process.”

“If approved, these projects will be earmarked as line items, under the programs of your national government. In this way, they will be enacted into law as part of our national budget,” Mr. Aquino said.

No more ‘consumables’

But the projects should not include “consumable” soft projects, such as fertilizers, seeds, medicines, medical kits, dentures, funding for sports festivals, training materials, and other such items, he said.

And the funds can no longer be disbursed through NGOs and certain government-owned and controlled corporations (GOCCs), some of which had been used in the pork barrel scam, Mr. Aquino said.

Those GOCCs will be abolished, along with others of their kind that have become notorious for irregularities, and seem to serve no other purpose than being instruments of corruption, he said.

Funds for projects should be limited to the districts or sectors of the legislators who sponsored them, he said.

Speaking to reporters after President Aquino announced on national television his decision to abolish the PDAF, Belmonte called on members of the House to “graciously accept” the abolition and prepare to follow a new system of financing projects for their constituents.

President Aquino promised to reform the corruption-plagued PDAF a month after the INQUIRER began to publish a series of reports on how businesswoman Janet Lim-Napoles allegedly siphoned off P10-billion in pork into her bank accounts through bogus NGOs over the past 10 years.

The INQUIRER series was validated by a Commission on Audit (COA) special audit of the PDAF from 2007 to 2009, the results of which showed that 12 senators and 180 congressmen channeled P6.156 billion in pork through 82 NGOs.

Announcing the results of the audit on Aug. 16, COA Chair Grace Pulido-Tan said 10 of the NGOs were “linked to Janet Lim-Napoles.”

The 10 NGOs got P2.157 billion, Tan said.

The confirmation of the INQUIRER reports stirred up public anger and calls for the abolition of the PDAF, including plans for  a Million People March to Rizal Park on Aug. 26 to demand the scrapping of the pork barrel.

After weeks of resisting those calls, President Aquino admitted on Friday that his own reforms did not stop the “scandalous” misuse of the PDAF.

“Despite the reforms we have implemented, we have seen, as the events of the past weeks have shown, that greater change is necessary to fight those who are determined to abuse the system. It is time to abolish the PDAF,” Mr. Aquino said.

New ‘mechanism’

The President directed Belmonte and Senate President Franklin Drilon, who flanked him as he spoke, to devise a “mechanism” by which the P25.24 billion allocated for the PDAF could be itemized in the P2.268-trillion proposed budget for 2014.

Through new mechanism, “every line, every peso, and every project” would be open to scrutiny, and the lawmakers’ constituents would get a “fair and equitable share” in the budget in the form of health services, scholarships, livelihood and infrastructure, Mr. Aquino said.

The new system appears to have been under discussion between Malacañang and the Senate and House leadership, as Belmonte was ready with answers to potential questions from the congressmen.

Belmonte advised the members of the House to begin constituency consultations and prepare a list of suggested projects that would be scrutinized during the deliberations on the budget in the House and the Senate.

“I call on the congressmen to begin listing down (projects), asking suggestions from your barangay captains, your mayors. Come up with a list of projects that you want to pursue,” Belmonte said.

 

GAME-CHANGER It seemed President Aquino preempted the Million People March on Monday meant to register the people’s outrage against misuse of pork barrel when he announced its abolition. He earlier defended pork, saying it was helping the poor all over the country. Flanking him are Senate President Franklin Drilon and Speaker Feliciano Belmonte Jr. who have been tasked to devise a new mechanism to replace the irreversibly hated PDAF.MALACAÑANG PHOTO BUREAU

 

Competitive bidding

And items needed for the projects would be subject to “open and competitive bidding,” with all bid notices and awards to be posted on the Philippine Government Electronic Procurement System or PhilGEPS, Mr. Aquino said.

Straight earmarks

The President said he had directed Budget Secretary Florencio Abad to consult with Drilon and Belmonte in devising the new mechanism and submit it to him “as soon as possible.”

In budget legislation, the itemization of projects and allocation of funds for their development is called “straight earmarking.” The result of straight earmarking is pork.

The abolition of the PDAF therefore will not take away from lawmakers the privilege of choosing projects and allocating funds for the development of those projects.

That explains the 180-degree turn by congressmen and senators yesterday from their opposition to the public call for the abolition of the PDAF.

Samar Rep. Mel Sarmiento of the Liberal Party said Mr. Aquino’s decision “speaks a lot about his determination to defy the conventions of business-as-usual politics and set in place all the needed reforms to defeat all forms of corruption in the government.”

Sarmiento added: “I fully support President Aquino’s decision to scrap the PDAF, especially with his assurance that all the people that we’ve been helping through the PDAF will not be left behind and our scholars will not be forced to stop going to school.”

Iloilo Rep. Jerry Treñas, another administration ally, described Mr. Aquino’s decision as “unprecedented,” and said it “would certainly help in ensuring transparency in the use of public funds.”

Buhay Rep. Lito Atienza, who earlier called for the suspension of the pork barrel, commended the President for his “sensitive decisiveness on the issue and heeding the people’s outrage.”

“It is wrong for legislators to appropriate funds which they themselves decide how to spend. The source of corruption is the discretionary nature of the pork barrel system as practiced,” Atienza said.

Marikina Rep. Romero Quimbo, chair of the House ways and means committee, supported the President’s decision, saying the “line item budgeting approach is more transparent and accountable.”

 

Support from senators

Senators from both the administration and the opposition coalitions also supported Mr. Aquino’s decision to abolish the PDAF.

“I’m quite happy and I thank President Aquino for his position that the pork barrel should be abolished and be replaced by line item budgeting wherein the use of public funds would be made more transparent,” Senate Majority Leader Alan Peter Cayetano said.

Cayetano and Sen. Francis Escudero, chair of the committee on finance that will soon hear the administration’s proposed budget for next year, have filed separate resolutions for the abolition of the PDAF.

“Good move in the name of continuing reforms in the government,” said administration Sen. Aquilino Pimentel III, chair of the committee on justice and human rights.

“Let’s prepare for a very thick and detailed national budget because there will be line item budgeting to reflect budget priorities at the national, district and sectoral levels,” Pimentel said.

“[I]f it must be scrapped, the pork barrel should be scrapped totally,” Sen. Juan Ponce Enrile said at a news conference on Friday.

“We should not only look at scrapping the PDAF, but [also abolishing] the various pork barrel or lump-sum appropriations of all departments of government,” said Enrile, one of the senators linked to the pork barrel scam allegedly masterminded by Napoles.

Sen. Gregorio Honasan, also linked to the pork scam, said the abolition of the PDAF was “a start but not the final solution.”

Honasan said he feared merely abolishing the pork barrel would just transfer the discretion over development and assistance projects and the potential for corruption from the legislative branch to the executive.

Can do without it

Sen. Jinggoy Estrada, another opposition coalition member linked to the pork scam, said he could do without the pork barrel.

“I welcome it,” Estrada said, reacting to President Aquino’s announcement.

But Estrada expressed apprehension about the loss of medical assistance the senators could provide for needy constituents.

“In my case, the queue for medical assistance is quite long,” he said.

Sen. Ramon Revilla Jr. also linked to Napoles’ alleged racket, welcomed the President’s decision.

“This issue has unnecessarily tarnished the legislature so much that the safeguards now proposed by the President is a very welcome development,” Revilla said.

Sen. Ferdinand Marcos lauded Mr. Aquino’s decision.

“I’m glad that the President has made clear his position on the PDAF. I have been for the abolition and one with my fellow senators,” Marcos said.

The business community also welcomed Mr. Aquino’s decision.

But Melito Salazar, president of the Management Association of the Philippines, recommended that the new mechanism for financing congressional projects be made open to public scrutiny.

Salazar said the public was angry not just over the PDAF but also over the corruption that came with the use of the pork barrel during the Arroyo administration.

Miguel Varela, president of the Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PCCI), also lauded the President’s decision, but said businessmen expected the government to lay down guidelines for appropriations and fund releases.

‘Small victory’

Former National Treasurer Leonor Briones, professor emeritus at the University of the Philippines-National College of Public Administration and Governance, described Mr. Aquino’s decision to abolish the PDAF as a “small victory” that should not lull Filipinos into giving up protests against lump-sum appropriations in the budget. With reports from Norman Bordadora and Amy R. Remo

 

Read more: http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/473245/pork-barrel-out-no-more-ngos#ixzz2coKOtbP4
Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook

What is a Pork Barrel ?

What is a Pork Barrel ?

+Below is a good explanation of what a  pork barrel is.
Pork barrel is an American budget/ funding process from government to spend for localized projects secured solely or primarily to bring money to a representative’s district.

The usage originated in American English.  In election campaigns, the term is used in derogatory fashion to attack opponents. Scholars, however, use it as a technical term regarding legislative control of local appropriations.
The Philippines being once a colony of the US, the Philippine government adopted and “adapted” this from its colonial masters but added its own extra twist!!!

The Filipino Pork Barrel appropriation was ultimately and sadly given a ‘unique’ treatment by successive Philippine governments, whereby those meant to benefit at the bottom never or rarely received the full benefit it was meant for.  Basically the money is siphoned off at various stages.
But explaining what happens to pork barrel in a nutshell goes like this.

As an example, a senator secures P200M to build a new bridge in his constituency.   The senator will ask someone he knows already from his golf club to get the bridge done. He will only release P150,000,000 (P50M is now his pocket money , some pocket money!!!) to this friend/cohort who in turn will keep P30,000,000 for himself and look for an architect/engineer, preferably a relative or a friend, to make plans for the bridge with P120,000,000 budget. The architect/engineer will keep P20,000,000 for himself release P100,000,000 to a contractor, again a relative or a friend, who will keep P10,000,000 to himself and will buy materials from a relative’s hardware stores/shops at a mark up prices and then subcontracted the building of the bridge to someone else. The subcontractor will get his percentage too, then hire relatives and friends to build the bridge at their on time. The bridge will be built but done in the cheapest possible way. This scenario goes on all the time. In most government projects. Pseudo Non Government Organisations (NGOs) are created whereby chosen NGO ‘officials’ take their cut. Work may get completed but the quality suffers and is not long-lasting and sustainable

 

It could be said that as the British saying goes many have ‘their noses in the pig’s trough’ 😉 taking their fill leaving a remnant of the budget for actual project work.

JXXX
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Understanding the Pork Barrel

August 18, 2013 | Politics & Government

Source: Pugad ng Maharlika

Pork-barrel-sourcesEveryone in the loops and cobwebs of the Pork Barrel scam is guilty. None in the houses of corruption would point a finger or raise a fist to protest against this mother paker of all scams. While the media is grilling Napoles and those bombs, explosion and stupid collision of big ships would want to draw out public perception from this scam, citizens wouldn’t blink an eye to monitor every bit of news related to the scam. Why? Because each one of them (or us) feels robbed by the rotten system of loops and cobwebs of layers of deceit and deception. Why? Because the taxes from simple candies, cigarettes, toyo and suka that we buy from the sari-sari store goes to the treasury that will be a part of the pork barrel recipe.

Each time we renew our license and customs would tax us exorbitantly of the parcels we sent through Fedex we are ripped off once these taxes and fees becomes a fraction of the source of the infamous PDAF. Nonetheless the understanding of the citizenry should not stop at the house of Napoles na mukhang mapapanis na sa media. This should go beyond napoles where from the different sources, verified or otherwise, gives us the total picture of how the pork barrel system works.

The budget or budgeting is a function of government that provides the whole bureaucracy the oil to make each of the the machinery of each departments and agencies run smoothly. It starts with the call of the CEO to have every offices under his command to provide him the budget for deliberation for the coming year.

Pork-barrel-how-it-is-created

The process begins and ends with the CEO. The figure / diagram is self explanatory. The next thing is we should understand the layer upon layer of the web of men and women, organizations, agencies, departments etc. and how these relationships work. At the top are the offices of the DPWH, the Office of the President and the Houses of Thieves. They have the biggest allocation in the government budget that is solely designed to favor them. The second layer are the power brokers that includes those government employees that works within these agencies/offices; the private citizens like Napoles with their NGOS; and the NGOs that have been created by the politicians in the Houses of Thieves. This layer is responsible for the haggling and higgling of percentages.

Pork-barrel-layers

The last part of the process would be the approval part… who approves the releases… they are pictured in the diagram. Who benefits from them are the assholes who have their luxury SUVs parked in front of the hotels and posh restos that we see everyday. Now aren’t you wondering why the Philippines is so fucked up economically?

What we need is to ask Ban Ki Moon of the United Nations to bring in a fact finding commission on this scam. Everyone in the bureaucracy is on the take.

http://majesticslair.wordpress.com/