Tag: Benigno Aquino III

Freedom of Information in the Philippines

Freedom of Information in the Philippines

 

 

With the recent  Napoles  Pork Barrel PDAF funding scandal in the Philippines, the nation should swiftly adopt Freedom of Information (FOI) to make government and official processes, funding etc., more transparent and accessible to the people.

In the Philippines news recently, Senator Grace  Poe-Llamanzares presented an initial fact-finding result about enacting and establishing Freedom of Information (FOI).

The  consensus of the government she found was that FOI will be detrimental to the national security of the nation. This seems specious as FOI has been successfully applied in many countries such as the US, UK and most of Europe and some Asian nations such as Malaysia.

Not taking up FOI is more of a personal choice rather than a public one.

As below national security is encompassed and protected in FOI legislation.

Most citizens, particularly tax payers would like to know how their government, departments and  public bodies are spending budgets allotted to them, particularly for public works,  or what they actually do and achieve.

Generally such statistics are not relevant or applicable to national security!?

Hmm.. or does Sen. Poe-Llamanzares and others with a vested interest, think that ‘National Security’ would be compromised by civil unrest/riots if people found out how they are being conned by corrupt officials and despite the Philippines becoming richer, the general populace never see any benefit where it is needed most? 

We hope President  Aquino will strongly consider introducing FOI after his speech about the PDAF scandal where he stated more transparency is needed!

Below if you like to know  is a basic guide to FOI as applied in UK etc.

 

FOI works in two ways:

  • public authorities are obliged to publish certain information about their activities; and
  • members of the public are entitled to request information from public authorities.

Public authorities spend money collected from taxpayers etc., and make decisions that can significantly affect many people’s lives.  Access to information helps the public make public authorities accountable for their actions and allows public debate to be better informed and more productive.

Recorded information includes printed documents, computer files, letters, emails, photographs, and sound or video recordings.

In the UK we have the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) which is similar to other countries having FOI.

  • everybody has a right to access official information. Disclosure of information should be the default – in other words, information should be kept private only when there is a good reason and it is permitted by the Act;
  • an applicant (requester) does not need to give  a reason for wanting the information. On the contrary, you must justify refusing them information;
  • All requests for information are treated equally, except under some circumstances relating to vexatious requests and personal data .
  • The information someone can get under the Act should not be affected by who they are.  All  requesters should be treated equally, whether they are journalists, local residents, public authority employees, or foreign researchers; and
  • because you should treat all requesters equally, you should only disclose information under the Act if you would disclose it to anyone else who asked. In other words, you should consider any information you release under the Act as if it were being released to the world at large.

Sensitive information such as for national security, legal, crime investigation etc, personal data can be exempt if there is good reason, however Governments etc., should not hide behind such if not applicable.    

Some sensitive documents are released but are redacted (some content blacked out-covered) if deemed necessary.

An FOI request can be refused under the following circumstances:

  • It would cost too much or take too much staff time to deal with the request.( if a straight forward  request such as providing statistics or costs, normally there is no fee. However the request is for detailed information that would require research and collation a fee is required).
  • The request is vexatious.
  • The request repeats a previous request from the same person.

In addition, the Freedom of Information Act contains a number of exemptions that allow you to withhold information from a requester. In some cases, it will allow you to refuse to confirm or deny whether you hold information.

Some exemptions relate to a particular type of information, for instance, information relating to government policy. Other exemptions are based on the harm that would arise or would likely arise from disclosure, for example, if disclosure would be likely to prejudice a criminal investigation, national security or prejudice someone’s commercial interests.

There is also an exemption for personal data if releasing it would be contrary to the Data Protection Act.

Most government official agencies have individuals or sections dealing with FOI requests from the public.

In the UK we can make a request(must always be written)  through letter or email.

Normally there is a set time for the government to reply to a request. in the UK it is 20 working days.

The UK has an Information Commissioner who can intercede with the government etc. if the FOI Act is not being followed correctly.

 

Napoles Surrenders to PNoy

Janet Lim – Napoles

Who is this man? Mar Roxas? He is absolutely mental. Why is he so deferential to Janet Napoles. Mar  called her ma’am?!!! She is a criminal. She fled! She was a wanted woman and yet you seems to have your head firmly stuck up her backside! You are making me ashamed to be a Filipino.  We should not kowtow to criminals!!!

Next you will be ordering the best food, gourmet food with a French chef for your ma’am Janet, you will have beds with memory foam complete with 400 thread counts  Egyptian cotton sheets for your ma’am Janet.  Only the best for your ma’am Janet!!! I can see that now? You will treat her like a heroine and not the criminal that she is. She fled from the arms of the law! Hello!!!

“Mahal ng Diyos ang Pilipinas?” What is that?  God has nothing to do with criminal goings on in the Philippines.  We leave that to the Government.

It is more believable that Janet was in contact with the other pork barrel scammers and she is now surrendering because there is now a deal done.

Janet is likely to get off as she remains to have friends in high places and admirers, like little Mar here!

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Napoles surrenders to PNoy, now in PNP custody – Palace
August 28, 2013 11:03pm

(Updated 12:18 a.m., 29 August 2013) The long search for Janet Napoles, the trader at the center of a P10-billion pork barrel scam, finally ended Wednesday night with her surrender to President Benigno Aquino III, Malacañang said Wednesday night.

Presidential spokesman Edwin Lacierda issued a statement which said that Napoles “surrendered” to Aquino at 9:37 p.m.

“The President turned her [Napoles] over to the custody of Interior and Local Government Secretary Mar Roxas and Philippine National Police Director-General Alan Purisima for processing and booking,” added the statement.

Napoles is wanted on charges of serious illegal detention arising from the alleged kidnapping of pork-barrel scam whistleblower Benhur Luy.

The Palace statement was silent on Napoles’ brother, Reynald Lim, who is also wanted for the same charge.

A separate report by radio dzBB’s Benjie Liwanag Jr. said that the Palace welcomed Napoles’ surrender, which came hours after Aquino announced a P10-million bounty for information leading to her capture.

Napoles had been on the run since a Makati court issued an arrest warrant against her and her brother Reynald earlier this month.

The P10-billion scam Napoles was implicated in involved the questionable use of the Priority Development Assistance Fund.

The scandal fueled outrage that prompted thousands of Filipinos to attend a march against the pork barrel system in Manila last Monday.

Last Friday, President Aquino said it was time to abolish the PDAF, but said he wanted a “transparent” mechanism to replace it.

Camp Crame

Meanwhile, security at Philippine National Police headquarters at Camp Crame was tight as Napoles, accompanied by Aquino, was brought there for booking, dzBB’s Cecilia Villarosa reported.

Janet Lim-Napoles, isinasailalim na sa Booking Procedure sa Kampo Crame.

— DZBB Super Radyo (@dzbb) August 28, 2013

The report added that Aquino left before midnight.

Meanwhile, Napoles’s lawyer, Lorna Kapunan, said in a radio interview following Napoles’ surrender that her client feared for her safety.

“She asked she be placed in a secure place. Maraming nakakainteres na matahimik siya forever,” Kapunan said in an interview on dzBB radio.

Kapunan also said her client would cooperate in the investigation into the pork barrel mess.

“Siya naman matagal nagsasabi mag-a-appear siya sa anumang investigation, magsasabi siya ng totoo,” she said.

Roxas press briefing

Secretary Roxas said Kapunan sent the Napoles’ surrender feeler through Presidential Spokesperson Edwin Lacierda, a former colleague of hers in a law firm.

He added that President Aquino responded being the “executor of all laws of the country” and after noontime gave the order to fetch Napoles from a location Roxas declined to specify.

Before Napoles came before the president, she underwent a medical check-up to determine the state of her health. Roxas said the doctors learned that Napoles was taking medicines meant to calm her down.

Responding to news media questions about special treatment for Napoles, the DILG chief said Napoles was a wanted person and the president as chief executive has the responsibility to secure Napoles, bring her “back to the ambit of the law” and ensure that she will be able to testify before the court, so that the whole truth about the pork barrel scam will be known.

Roxas said Aquino volunteered to accompany him and Purisima in bringing Napoles to Camp Crame. — DVM/ELR, GMA News

Pork Barrel By Another Name (Gravy Train)

Pork Barrel By Another Name (Gravy Train)

Ooopps  Have we all rejoiced too early after the announcement by PNoy (President Benigno Aquino III) that the much flawed Pork Barrel funding will be abolished. We now learn that any changes maybe just cosmetic, and all that may happen is a name change from PDAF pork barrel to just another vultures dinner!?
Perhaps to use UK slang further alluding to the pork meat connotation, those who had their greedy pig like snouts in the trough(of free cash) now know the pork will be covered by ‘gravy’ taking their fill from the ‘gravy train'(a position in which one receives excessive and unjustified money or advantages with little or no effort).

Clearly we need a fuller and transparent explanation of the new funding system and how the bottom line spending will benefit those it is supposed to be targeted to. Senators should not be handing finances, funding should be centralised for more control and accountability. For example medical health care should be nationalised with a central department dealing with distributing the funding to where it is needed and all should know where the money is going to.
No more nurtured Napoles’!

We heard that approx only 60,000 people turned up at the anti-Pork Barrel ‘Million People March’ in Luneta Park, Manila on 26 August 2013. It was hoped that many many more making the numbers of demonstrators near to the titled ‘million’ would attend. PINOYS should not be complacent. Though this was rather disappointing, we will not stop until every single peso is accounted for. We need proof that the noble ‘rhetoric and promises of reform'(not rename)- from the leader of our nation made before millions on Friday 23 August 2013, will indeed become fact and not more ‘smoke and mirrors’ deception as in the past. Come on PNoy make history and us proud!!! It is daang matuwid, nevermind the t-junctions, just bulldoze your way into sanity and honesty.